Exit	Northbound / Eastbound	Southbound / Westbound
CONTINUE SOUTH ACROSS CONNECTICUT BORDER
1	193 Webster
2	16 Webster Douglas
3	Cudsworth Rd South Oxford North Webster
4A	Sutton Ave Sutton
4B	Sutton Ave Oxford
5	Depot Rd North Oxford
6A	East Shrewsbury TO 146
6B	West Sturbridge
	END NB BEGIN EB
7	12 North Mass Pike Auburn
8	no exit	12 South Webster
		ENDWB BEGIN SB
9	Swanson Rd Auburn	Auburn St Auburn
10	no exit	12 North Hope Ave
11	Southbridge St College Sq
12	146 South Brosnihan Sq Milbury
13	122A Vernon St Kelley Sq
14	122 Barre Uxbridge	Barre Uxbridge
15	Shrewsbury St	no exit
16	Central St Downtown Worcester
17	9 Ware Framingham	no exit
18	no exit	TO 9 Ware Framingham
19	TO 12 North Holden Fitchburg	TO 12 North Fitchburg
20	70 Lincoln St Burncoat St
21	Plantation St Worcester	no exit
22	Main St Shrewsbury	Main St Shrewsbury Worcester
23A	140 South Shrewsbury
23B	140 North Boylston
24	Church St Boylston Northboro
25A	Hudson St Northboro
25B	Solomon Pond Mall Road Berlin
26A	South Cape Cod
26B	North Lowell LEFT EXIT	North Lowell

This is the only instance (so far) where I have two differently numbered highways on one page. The reason is that they are one highway from an exit numbering perspective. The limited access portion of the road continues east of 495, with an intersection before ending at Mass 85. Rumors state that the highway was to continue inside the 495 beltway, ending at 95/128. My question - would they have given the inner section another number? A favorite renumbering scheme is to reroute 93 down I-495 from their northern junction, onto 290, onto 395 and down to New London. Make the section of 93 currently within the 495 beltway something else - 895? (695 might raise a few hackles amongst those who fought the original Inner Beltway).